Linguistic Resistance in the Global South
From Linguistic Practice to Political Action: Toward a Theory of Resistance Communication in the Global South Abstract In the Global South, the linguistic practices remain significantly under-researched as a tool of political resistance. The main reason was that existing resistance communication theories were predominantly framed by global south, structural-oriented frameworks. There is a gap in explaining how everyday indigenous linguistic practice, such as code-switching, satire, and narratives, translates into effective political mobilization. This research implements a qualitative examination framework guided by PRISMA protocols using systematic document analysis. The data were extracted from JSTOR, Google Scholar, and Scopus. In addition, the inductive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s six-phase framework was applied. Three main themes are obtained by analysis. This includes language as a source of resistance, indigenous digital linguistic practices, and structural limitations to resistance communication. Through four interlinked stages of resistance communication functions. This includes framing, amplification, expression, and mobilization. Surveillance, Censorship, and uneven infrastructure restrict effectiveness. This effectiveness remains even when marginalized groups implement reorganized strategies, including encrypted contacts. Thus, the study updates the Resistance Communication Theory in daily linguistic practices. The findings are effective for activists, policymakers, and educators because helps in supporting the marginalized groups in changing the power framework through language. In addition, support systems such as assignment writing help uae can assist students and researchers in structuring and presenting complex academic analyses more effectively. Introduction The role of linguistic practices to shape political actions in the global south has increased over the last few years, especially in the academic sector. The research is about to see daily communication from informal language and slogans to online communication’s impact on the function of resistance and addition to the political organization. Almost 70% from last decade of recent communication research focused on the role of language in political mobilization and digital activism, which has increased in the non-Western domain.. The framework of research questions, objectives, and questions by communication practices. This implementation mostly in the context of socio-politics, history, and institutions. The study is about the importance of language, as it is not just a source of communication. Thus, it is a strategic tool that helps in developing different political realities.. The excluded groups, through these linguistic practices, challenge the powerful frameworks. This study highlights the limitations of the conventional Western-centric communication theories. The research proposes the best framework to understand the mechanism of transferring linguistic practices into a political movement. 60% of the population depends on the informal or local languages for daily communication.. This shows their central role in shaping political awareness and engagement. The institutional centers shaped the reach of power, rule, and economic opportunities. Thus, the local language and informal forms of communication sometimes affect the formal institutional spaces and politics. Thus, these languages are powerful sources of resistance. These make the communities and individuals give confident feedback, reform their identities, and challenge the dominant discourse. Thus, the communication became a struggle. The power of language in a non-Western context sometimes works outside the formal networks. Thus, the power of language is used in developed oral traditions, ordinary narratives, and destructive anagrams. The meanings for languages are then debated, and the power relationships are checked. The mainstream communication theories sometimes overlapped with the informal language practices. The limitation in understanding the resistance to working in a non-Western context. The traditional theories focus on the formal channels and debates. These randomly ignore the informal language practices. It works as the foundation for public political thinking. On the other hand, the resistance communication is inherent in the decentralized, cultural link and informal expressions. This resistance communication includes informal communication, satire, code transfer, and sign narratives. This results in objecting to the marginalized groups to develop an alternative space and room for political debate. 65% of social movement communication is done by digital platforms. In this, hashtags and online discourse play a significant role in mobilizing largely contributions.. The modern technologies have further updated and modified the conventional resistance communication. This allows the fast transmission of ideas and activations. In addition, the social media platforms, digital narratives, and hashtags increase the linguistic practices. This also allows the facilitation of unity and collective actions across international boundaries. But the unequal access to the suppression, monitoring, and technology will result. This will limit the involvement of these digital areas. A gap remains to explain the language practices converted into political actions. The gap will remain despite the deep focus on communication in social movements. 30% or less than that of previous literature gives a clear structure that transforms linguistic practices into political action. Although the interest rate is increasing, it shows a significant research gap in this domain. In the previous literature, there lacks a collective framework that connects the language to mobilization. Instead, this framework highlights the discourse and formation. This gap is important in the global south. The diverse context in the global south needs more strategic and specific context-based approaches. This research addresses the gap by evaluating the relation between the political action and linguistic practices in the global south. The research aims to create a conceptual structure. This explains the contribution of daily life communication to resistance and mobilization. Furthermore, there is an identification of the ways through which languages develop collective identity, add to cooperative actions, and shape political meanings. This will allow the transfer from descriptive statements of communication in social movements. The understanding of resistant communications as dynamic and context-specific is clear. Q1: how the linguistic practices work as a tool of resistance in the Global South? Q2: What are the roles of digital communication sources in boosting the resistance communication? Q3: How does discourse add to the formation of political awareness and uni-identity? Q4: What institutional, technological, and structural limitations affect the resistance communication effect? The communication research gap finding skill is the significance of the research. This critical gap is addressed by connecting linguistic practices in the global south with political operations. This research shows the role of … Read more