Skip to content
Why does data analysis at Ajman University depend on real research conventions, not generic SPSS tutorials?
Published research conducted by Ajman University faculty shows exactly how rigorous data analysis at this institution actually needs to be.
Quasi-Experimental Study
A real quasi-experimental study examining blended learning's effect on Dentistry College students' physics achievement split 116 participants into an experimental group of 59 and a control group of 57.
SPSS Findings
Using SPSS to confirm statistically significant differences favoring the experimental group, with a further finding that achievement varied by gender within the experimental group specifically.
Methodological Rigor
This is the level of methodological rigor, including proper group splitting, validity testing, and disaggregated findings, that Ajman University coursework and research are actually measured against.
Mixed-Methods Research
A separate Ajman University study on e-learning usability used the established Zaharias 2009 e-learning usability evaluation questionnaire as its primary data collection instrument, paired with semi-structured interviews to gather qualitative data from faculty members.
Validated Instruments
This demonstrates a genuine mixed-methods approach already in active use at the university, not a hypothetical example. A data analysis project built without referencing established, validated instruments like this, when a validated instrument actually exists for the topic, misses a credibility signal examiners specifically look for. The same expectation for methodological rigour applies to postgraduate dissertation research, where the choice of instruments and analytical framework directly affects the credibility of the findings.
