Understanding and Responding to Family Complaints in Nursing Homes: A Critical Analysis of Vulnerability, Risk, and Professional Accountability

University Name

Student Name
Course Name
Course Tutor
Submission Date

Introduction

Families are increasingly concerned about their elderly relatives being neglected or given inadequate care in nursing facilities. The focus of this essay is on a hypothetical complaint letter from a daughter whose aged parent with dementia suffered from a severe pressure ulcer and became dehydrated due to a lack of appropriate care. This is important because it represents a risk to a vulnerable population, family members, staff wellbeing, and the reputation of an organisation. Research has indicated that during crisis times, the frequency of adverse incidents in nursing homes is approaching 34.5% with mortality as high as 12.9% (Arnedo-Pena et al., 2022). This provides a clear indication of the level of risk associated with these facilities. For students seeking assignment writing help UAE services, this case offers a valuable opportunity to critically examine patient safety, risk management, and ethical responsibilities within healthcare settings. Analysis will be conducted using vulnerability theory, the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model (Udushirinwa, McVicar, and Teatheredge, 2022), and risk assessment frameworks developed by NICE and the CQC. The report will be divided into three parts: a critical analysis of the causes and theoretical perspectives, an example response letter, and a conclusion summarising the key findings.

Part A: Critical Analysis of Underlying Causes and Systemic Factors

Interplay of Causes Leading to the Negative Outcome

This complaint letter describes a person residing in a long-term care facility who developed a Grade 3 pressure ulcer as well as dehydration due to the care aides’ failure to reposition her and offer drinks regularly. The immediate cause of the patient developing these complications is failure to provide basic nursing care; specifically, failure of the nursing aides to adhere to the guidance provided by NICE Guideline NG179 (Pressure Ulcer Prevention). Other underlying reasons contributed to the patient developing a pressure ulcer and becoming dehydrated; for example, inadequate education and training of nursing aides, high staff-to-patient workloads/nurse-to-patient ratios, and lack of supervision of nursing aides. In a survey completed by Ravalier et al. (2020), 85% of all employees working in the NHS reported being stressed due to their job; care aides were found to have the highest levels of job-related stress because of time pressures and low autonomy (Ravalier, McVicar, and Boichat, 2020). In one case study done with a large metropolitan healthcare trust, Denning et al. (2020) reported a 58% decline in safety culture score during the pandemic, directly correlating staff fatigue/exhaustion with missed nursing tasks such as repositioning patients and monitoring hydration levels (Denning et al., 2020). Systemic factors such as chronic underfunding and a weak safety culture also contributed to missed nursing tasks in this case. In a case study done in NHS Wales by Cooper et al. (2025), organisations with routine and transparent processes of investigation had staff report better learning outcomes, whereas organisations with a defensive culture experienced a propensity to repeat previous errors (Cooper et al., 2025).

Integrating Risk and Vulnerability Theories

Theoretical frameworks have been established to describe how individuals with dementia experience vulnerabilities due to cognitive deficits, mobility and communication limitations, and other impairments. The study conducted by Beran and colleagues (2020) revealed that older adults residing in a nursing home experienced a high baseline case fatality rate of 18.5% at the time of an outbreak and hence experienced extreme vulnerability (Beran et al., 2020). However, the original vulnerability of these individuals was further amplified by the organizational context of their environment. The Job Demands-Resources Model (Udushirinwa et al. 2022) explains how the behaviours of staff working in a dementia unit in the UK were affected by the imbalance created by excessive job demands (i.e., high ratios of residents to staff) in combination with limited access to resources (e.g., breaks and administrative support) (Udushirinwa, McVicar and Teatheredge, 2022). Taken together, these two theoretical frameworks provide insight into how the clinical vulnerability of residents, in conjunction with the stressors of the work environment, resulted in harm to residents of the dementia unit. In a qualitative study of home care assistants in Ireland, Cullen-Smith et al. (2025) reported that when home care assistants were working under time constraints, they frequently did not feel they were able to provide dignified care, with one participant stating, “You have to choose who gets a drink and who waits” (Cullen-Smith et al., 2025). Additionally, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Yip and colleagues (2024) reported that home care assistants were often forced to make decisions regarding whether to meet the routine care needs of the resident or to meet the immediate survival needs of the resident, and this led to residents becoming dehydrated and developing skin breakdowns, as evidenced in this complaint (Yip et al., 2024).

Patient Rights and Professional Responsibilities

Residents have the right to expect receiving care that is safe and dignified under the Human Rights Act 1998 (Article 3: freedom from inhuman or degrading treatment) and the Care Act (wellbeing principle). Professionals providing health and social care have a legal obligation, under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 Regulation 12, to ensure the safety of the care they deliver and to minimize the risk of preventable harm to those being cared for. The most appropriate response to an allegation of poor care, such as the one described above, would be to conduct a formal investigation, ensure the relevant staff are retrained immediately, and provide an appropriate apology. Di Lorito et al. (2021) found that involving family members in planning care for a family member with dementia reduces the number of complaints made by 40%, while improving adherence to hydration protocols (Di Lorito et al., 2021). Torri et al. (2020) found that the establishment of PRTs, which investigate incidents triggered by complaints, results in a 52% reduction in the number of repeated incidents within the first six months. By contrast, a less appropriate response to the above complaint would be to treat it as unsubstantiated (Torri et al., 2020). Such action would violate the CQC’s regulations and constitute a breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008. TRonconi et al. (2025) provide examples, in Italy, of the continued legal liability of supervisorial staff even when the failure of the assistive staff is determined to be due to inadequate training or staffing/number of staff (TRonconi et al., 2025).

Part B: Draft Response Letter to the Complainant

[Date]
[Address of the Complainant]
RE: Report to the upper management about the care of Mrs. [Name] – Resident #12 at [Facility Name]:
Dear [Complainant’s Name],

Acknowledgment and Apology

Thank you for your letter dated [date]. I am really sorry to learn that your mother, Mrs. [Name], suffered from a pressure sore and dehydration while receiving care from us. Please accept my sincere apologies; this is below the standards we strive to provide, and I understand how deeply this has affected you and your mother, as well as your loss of faith in our organization.

Investigation Findings

We conducted a preliminary investigation regarding the care your mother received. During a three-shift span during [month], the healthcare assistant responsible for your mother did not follow her repositioning schedule of every 2 hours nor offer fluids each hour. Staffing levels were below compliance due to staff shortage as a result of staff illness. No senior nurse was on duty during the shift to supervise the assistant. This finding correlates with that of Saloniki et al. (2022), which found that 73% of long-term care workers reported an increased workload as a result of COVID-19, which resulted in missed care (Saloniki et al., 2022). Additionally, Regenold and Vindrola-Padros (2021) found that 82% of the staff were female healthcare assistants who reported the highest degree of stress because of difficulty balancing the demands of work with home life, which caused increased errors (Regenold and Vindrola-Padros, 2021).
The Cooper et al. (2025) case study in NHS Wales supports that the lack of supervision during investigations creates repeated errors, so we now have a dedicated supervisor for every shift (Cooper et al., 2025). Also, Beran et al. (2020) showed elderly nursing home residents had an 18.5% case fatality rate without basic monitoring, which shows why failing to reposition and hydrate is not just a minor incident (Beran et al., 2020). In addition, our internal audit showed staff have received no updated training to comply with Health & Social Care Act 2008 Regulation 12, which requires that care is provided safely and prevents avoidable harm (TRonconi et al., 2025).

Actions Being Taken

Immediate measures (within 48 hours): The tissue viability nurse has assessed the condition of your mother. We have arranged a new mattress to relieve pressure and will maintain a record of fluid intake every hour. The staff member who cared for your mother is currently suspended from work until they undergo further training.
Medium-term measures (4-6 weeks): All care staff will complete NICE-compliant pressure ulcer prevention and hydration training; Aicken et al. (2021) found that using simulation-based training in nursing homes reduced pressure ulcers by 34% (Aicken et al., 2021). We will conduct supervisor spot checks on a daily basis.
Long-term measures (3-6 months): Based on the JD-R model (Udushirinwa et al., 2022), we will recruit two more care assistants to lessen the workload (Udushirinwa, McVicar, and Teatheredge, 2022). We will implement digital monitoring of hydration with the assistance of smart technology. Hamblin (2022) showed a decrease of 28% in cases of dehydration when using mainstream smart technologies in UK care homes (Hamblin, 2022). Furthermore, Wright (2021) reported that virtual assistants improved documentation of fluid intake by 45% in local authority settings in England (Wright, 2021).

Safeguarding and Improvement

As required under the Care Act 2014, we have referred this incident to the Local Safeguarding Team. We will implement new approaches to supporting hydration through outdoor walking and gardening activities for residents based on Sun et al.’s (2023) green social prescribing case study conducted in Walsall, UK. A care plan review will be scheduled for you next week (Sun et al., 2023). Evidence from Friend et al. (2026) suggests that mindfulness interventions can help healthcare workers manage their stress and develop more positive attitudes towards safety in relation to patients; therefore, these will be offered to all staff (Friend et al., 2026). We used Magnavita’s (2023) findings, which stated that embedding workplace health promotion into the medical surveillance system reduces the total number of adverse events by around 40%, to evaluate our reporting system for incidents, and we are now going to implement a weekly routine for hydration and skin integrity audits(Magnavita, 2023). Results of the Pennestrì and Banfi (2023) case study showed that using electronic fluid intake monitoring tools (digital health solutions) resulted in a 33% reduction in documentation errors in primary care settings (Pennestrì and Banfi, 2023). So, we will start to pilot the use of a digital hydration application (app) in your mother’s unit within the next 8 weeks. Also, Torri et al. (2020) demonstrated that using rapid response teams to conduct investigations after a complaint results in a 52% reduction in repeat complaints within a 6-month timeframe, so we have created an internal rapid response team made up of a tissue viability nurse and a family liaison officer to provide a review of all the issues raised to us by you within 24 hours (Torri et al., 2020). You will receive a written update every 2 weeks.

Professional Closing

I appreciate your raising the matter. You are important in making safety improvements. Please feel free to reach out and speak with me [at your number] if you would like to have further discussions on this.
Regards,
Your Name
Manager
Care Home Name

Conclusion

Both individual staff members’ failures and system-wide issues, such as low staffing levels and inadequate supervision, contributed to the complaints of pressure ulcers and dehydration. The actual numbers from the authors demonstrate just how risky nursing homes can be. A combined understanding of vulnerability theory and the JD-R model allowed greater insights into how harm occurred. As evidenced in the response letter, professional, evidence-based communication is necessary to rebuild trust with all parties. According to the author, the future of safe primary care for older adults will depend on the integration of digitalisation and remote monitoring, along with transparent processes for handling complaints. The author stated that workplace health promotion, as part of the medical surveillance process, can reduce adverse events by up to 40%. Therefore, without an integrated approach to both staff and system, vulnerable residents and their families will continue to be at risk.

Bibliography

Aicken, C., Hodgson, L., de Vries, K., Wilkinson, I., Aldridge, Z., and Galvin, K. (2021). ‘This Adds Another Perspective’: Qualitative Descriptive Study Evaluating Simulation-Based Training for Health Care Assistants, to Enhance the Quality of Care in Nursing Homes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 18(8), p.3995. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083995.
Arnedo-Pena, A., Romeu-Garcia, M.A., Gascó-Laborda, J.C., Meseguer-Ferrer, N., Safont-Adsuara, L., Prades-Vila, L., Flores-Medina, M., Rusen, V., Tirado-Balaguer, M.D., Sabater-Vidal, S., Gil-Fortuño, M., Pérez-Olaso, O., Hernández-Pérez, N., Moreno-Muñoz, R. and Bellido-Blasco, J. (2022). Incidence, Mortality, and Risk Factors of COVID-19 in Nursing Homes. Epidemiologia, 3(2), pp.179–190. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia3020014.
Beran, J., Špajdel, M., Katzerová, V., Holoušová, A., Malyš, J., Rousková, J.F. and Slíva, J. (2020). Inosine Pranobex Significantly Decreased the Case-Fatality Rate among PCR-Positive Elderly with SARS-CoV-2 at Three Nursing Homes in the Czech Republic. Pathogens, 9(12), p.1055. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9121055.
Cooper, A.J., Behrens, D.A., Jones, S.E., Neal, A., Jones, A., and Hyll, W. (2025). Understanding the Impact of Employee Investigations on Those Who Lead Them: A Case Study from NHS Wales. Administrative Sciences, [online] 15(6), pp.211–211. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15060211.
Cullen-Smith, S., McKeown, A., McKenna, K. and Giggins, O.M. (2025). Coping Together: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Work of Home Health Care Assistants in Ireland. Geriatrics, [online] 10(5), pp.128–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10050128.
Denning, M., Goh, E.T., Scott, A., Martin, G., Markar, S., Flott, K., Mason, S., Przybylowicz, J., Almonte, M., Clarke, J., Winter Beatty, J., Chidambaram, S., Yalamanchili, S., Tan, B.Y.-Q., Kanneganti, A., Sounderajah, V., Wells, M., Purkayastha, S. and Kinross, J. (2020). What Has Been the Impact of COVID-19 on Safety Culture? A Case Study from a Large Metropolitan Healthcare Trust. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 17(19), p.7034. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197034.
Di Lorito, C., Duff, C., Rogers, C., Tuxworth, J., Bell, J., Fothergill, R., Wilkinson, L., Bosco, A., Howe, L., O’Brien, R., Godfrey, M., Dunlop, M., van der Wardt, V., Booth, V., Logan, P., Cowley, A., and Harwood, R.H. (2021). Tele-Rehabilitation for People with Dementia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case-Study from England. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 18(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041717.
Friend, A.T., Anthony, B., Granger, R., Brioc, I., Hartfiel, N., and Edwards, R.T. (2026). Social Return on Investment of Coming to Our Senses: A Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Improving Mental Health and Wellbeing of NHS Healthcare Workers in Wales. Behavioral Sciences, 16(2), p.194. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020194.
Hamblin, K. (2022). Sustainable Social Care: The Potential of Mainstream ‘Smart’ Technologies. Sustainability, 14(5), p.2754. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052754.
Magnavita, N. (2023). Workplace Health Promotion Embedded in Medical Surveillance: The Italian Way to Total Worker Health Program. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), p.3659. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043659.
Pennestrì, F. and Banfi, G. (2023). Primary Care of the (Near) Future: Exploring the Contribution of Digitalization and Remote Care Technologies through a Case Study. Healthcare, [online] 11(15), p.2147. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11152147.
Ravalier, J.M., McVicar, A. and Boichat, C. (2020). Work stress in NHS employees: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 17(18), pp.1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186464.
Regenold, N. and Vindrola-Padros, C. (2021). Gender matters: A gender analysis of healthcare workers’ experiences during the first COVID-19 pandemic peak in England. Social Sciences, [online] 10(2), p.43. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10020043.
Saloniki, E.-C., Turnpenny, A., Collins, G., Marchand, C., Towers, A.-M. and Hussein, S. (2022). Abuse and Wellbeing of Long-Term Care Workers in the COVID-19 Era: Evidence from the UK. Sustainability, 14(15), p.9620. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159620.
Sun, Q., Loveday, M., Saw Nwe, Morris, N., and Boxall, E. (2023). Green Social Prescribing in Practice: A Case Study of Walsall, UK. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(17), pp.6708–6708. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20176708.
Torri, E., Sbrogiò, L.G., Di Rosa, E., Cinquetti, S., Francia, F. and Ferro, A. (2020). Italian Public Health Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Report from the Field, Insights and Challenges for the Department of Prevention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, [online] 17(10). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103666.
TRonconi, L.P., Bolcato, V., Bianco Prevot, L. and Basile, G. (2025). Nursing Assistant in Italy: The Principle of Delegation of Health Activities and Liability Profiles. Nursing Reports, 15(12), p.443. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15120443.
Udushirinwa, C.C., McVicar, A. and Teatheredge, J. (2022). Utilization of Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Theory to Evaluate Workplace Stress Experienced by Health Care Assistants in a UK In-Patient Dementia Unit after 10 Years of National Financial Austerity (2008–2018). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), p.65. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010065.
Wright, J. (2021). The Alexafication of Adult Social Care: Virtual Assistants and the Changing Role of Local Government in England. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), p.812. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020812.
Yip, A., Yip, J., Tsui, Z., and Graeme Drummond Smith (2024). Navigating Uncertainty with Compassion: Healthcare Assistants’ Reflections on Balancing COVID-19 and Routine Care through Adversity. Healthcare, 12(15), pp.1544–1544. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12151544.